OpenWeb vs SpeedSize
OpenWeb vs SpeedSize, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OpenWeb is on 63/100 and SpeedSize on 33/100.
Where each one leads
OpenWeb
- our overall score: 63/100 against 33/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 251 against 44
SpeedSize
- LinkedIn following: 6,368,401 against 29,086
At a glance
| Measure | OpenWeb | SpeedSize |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | OpenWeb partners with publishers and brands to foster healthy online conversations and build direct audience relationships. | AI-powered image and video compression to accelerate website media loading speeds. |
| Category | Media, Text Recognition, Text, Content Moderation | Media, Website, Optimization, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OpenWeb | SpeedSize |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 251 | 44 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -9.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $383M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 29,086 | 6,368,401 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OpenWeb | SpeedSize |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 16/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OpenWeb | SpeedSize |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Zendesk | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
OpenWeb vs SpeedSize: common questions
Which is better, OpenWeb or SpeedSize?
On our 0-100 score OpenWeb rates higher (63/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OpenWeb and SpeedSize compare on the numbers?
OpenWeb leads on our overall score (63/100 against 33/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 32/100), domain rating (71/100 against 60/100), headcount (251 against 44). SpeedSize leads on LinkedIn following (6,368,401 against 29,086).
Read the full OpenWeb review and pricing or the SpeedSize review and pricing. You can also browse other OpenWeb alternatives we track.