OpenGamma vs Thinkrisk
OpenGamma vs Thinkrisk, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OpenGamma is on 60/100 and Thinkrisk on 7/100.
Where each one leads
OpenGamma
- our overall score: 60/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 34/100
Thinkrisk
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | OpenGamma | Thinkrisk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides a cloud-native platform for risk analytics and derivatives trading for financial institutions. | AI-powered risk intelligence platform for financial institutions. |
| Category | Fintech, Risk Management, Derivatives Trading, Financial Services | Fintech, Risk Management, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Financial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2007 | Not published |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OpenGamma | Thinkrisk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 51 | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 43,803 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OpenGamma | Thinkrisk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (34/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OpenGamma | Thinkrisk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
OpenGamma vs Thinkrisk: common questions
Which is better, OpenGamma or Thinkrisk?
On our 0-100 score OpenGamma rates higher (60/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OpenGamma and Thinkrisk compare on the numbers?
OpenGamma leads on our overall score (60/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 34/100).
Read the full OpenGamma review and pricing or the Thinkrisk review and pricing. You can also browse other OpenGamma alternatives we track.