Ooma vs Smith Micro
Ooma vs Smith Micro, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ooma is on 55/100 and Smith Micro on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Ooma
- our overall score: 55/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 636 against 267
- funding raised: $167M against $28.6M
Smith Micro
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Ooma | Smith Micro |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based communications platform for businesses and consumers, offering VoIP, UCaaS, and smart security solutions. | A software company specializing in digital content, mobile device management, and graphics software. |
| Category | Telecommunication, SaaS, VoIP, Unified Communications | Digital Media, Mobile Technology, Graphics & Animation, Digital Content |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software, hardware, services | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 1987 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Aliso Viejo, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ooma | Smith Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 636 | 267 |
| Total funding | $167M | $28.6M |
| Latest round | IPO | Private Placement |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,799 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ooma | Smith Micro |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ooma | Smith Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Ooma vs Smith Micro: common questions
Which is better, Ooma or Smith Micro?
On our 0-100 score Ooma rates higher (55/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ooma and Smith Micro compare on the numbers?
Ooma leads on our overall score (55/100 against 49/100), headcount (636 against 267), funding raised ($167M against $28.6M). Smith Micro leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Ooma review and pricing or the Smith Micro review and pricing. You can also browse other Ooma alternatives we track.