Ontracx vs WHOOP
Ontracx vs WHOOP, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ontracx is on 42/100 and WHOOP on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Ontracx
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 25/100
WHOOP
- our overall score: 67/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 1,228 against 11
- funding raised: $575M against $13.2M
- LinkedIn following: 188,354 against 1,588
At a glance
| Measure | Ontracx | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Ontracx develops wearable sensors and a digital platform to help runners prevent injuries by tracking biomechanical load. | WHOOP is a wearable coach providing 24/7 health insights to help improve health, fitness, and longevity. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Sports Tech | Wearables, HealthTech, Fitness Technology, Consumer Electronics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | hardware | Not published |
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Ghent, Belgium | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ontracx | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 1,228 |
| Total funding | $13.2M | $575M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $10B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,588 | 188,354 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ontracx | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 14/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ontracx | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Ontracx | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | 24/7 Health Monitoring, Personalized Coaching, Medical-Grade Insights, Healthspan Tracking, Customizable Design, Irregular Heart Rhythm Notifications |
Ontracx vs WHOOP: common questions
Which is better, Ontracx or WHOOP?
On our 0-100 score WHOOP rates higher (67/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ontracx and WHOOP compare on the numbers?
Ontracx leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 25/100). WHOOP leads on our overall score (67/100 against 42/100), domain rating (80/100 against 29/100), headcount (1,228 against 11), funding raised ($575M against $13.2M), LinkedIn following (188,354 against 1,588).
Read the full Ontracx review and pricing or the WHOOP review and pricing. You can also browse other Ontracx alternatives we track.