Onshape vs Leo AI
Onshape vs Leo AI, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Onshape is on 62/100 and Leo AI on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Onshape
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 233 against 27
- funding raised: $89.0M against $9.7M
- LinkedIn following: 42,342 against 7,253
Leo AI
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 32/100
- headcount growth: +79.8% against +23.4%
At a glance
| Measure | Onshape | Leo AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native 3D CAD and PDM platform for collaborative product development. | Generative AI copilot for engineering design, turning ideas into 3D CAD models. |
| Category | CAD, Product Data Management, Cloud Native, SaaS | Generative AI, 3D, AI Agents, Engineering |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Onshape | Leo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 233 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +23.4% | +79.8% |
| Open roles | 100 | Not published |
| Total funding | $89.0M | $9.7M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 42,342 | 7,253 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Onshape | Leo AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 37/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Onshape | Leo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Onshape vs Leo AI: common questions
Which is better, Onshape or Leo AI?
On our 0-100 score Onshape rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Onshape and Leo AI compare on the numbers?
Onshape leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), domain rating (78/100 against 37/100), headcount (233 against 27), funding raised ($89.0M against $9.7M), LinkedIn following (42,342 against 7,253). Leo AI leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 32/100), headcount growth (+79.8% against +23.4%).
Read the full Onshape review and pricing or the Leo AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Onshape alternatives we track.