Onfleet vs WareMatch
Onfleet vs WareMatch, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Onfleet is on 55/100 and WareMatch on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Onfleet
- our overall score: 55/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 90 against 13
- funding raised: $20.0M against $2.0M
- LinkedIn following: 9,997 against 1,126
WareMatch
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 49/100
At a glance
| Measure | Onfleet | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Last-mile delivery management software for businesses with complex delivery operations. | Digitalizes industrial leasing and logistics coordination to optimize supply chains. |
| Category | LogisticsTech, Fleet Management, Supply Chain, Vertical SaaS | LogisticsTech, Marketplace, Supply Chain, Proptech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Onfleet | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 90 | 13 |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $2.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Early Stage VC |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,997 | 1,126 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Onfleet | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Onfleet | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Onfleet vs WareMatch: common questions
Which is better, Onfleet or WareMatch?
On our 0-100 score Onfleet rates higher (55/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Onfleet and WareMatch compare on the numbers?
Onfleet leads on our overall score (55/100 against 49/100), domain rating (71/100 against 25/100), headcount (90 against 13), funding raised ($20.0M against $2.0M), LinkedIn following (9,997 against 1,126). WareMatch leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 49/100).
Read the full Onfleet review and pricing or the WareMatch review and pricing. You can also browse other Onfleet alternatives we track.