ON Semiconductor vs SweGaN
ON Semiconductor vs SweGaN, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ON Semiconductor is on 20/100 and SweGaN on 60/100.
Where each one leads
ON Semiconductor
- domain rating: 78/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 15,493 against 37
- LinkedIn following: 372,763 against 3,660
SweGaN
- our overall score: 60/100 against 20/100
At a glance
| Measure | ON Semiconductor | SweGaN |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global leader in intelligent power and sensing technologies, driving innovation in automotive, industrial, and cloud power applications. | Designs, develops, and manufactures gallium nitride on silicon carbide (GaN-on-SiC) epitaxial wafers using proprietary growth technologies. |
| Category | Semiconductor, Power Management, Sensing Technology, Automotive Electronics | Semiconductors, Deep Tech, Materials Science, Electronics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 1999 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Phoenix, United States | Linköping, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ON Semiconductor | SweGaN |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15,493 | 37 |
| Total funding | Not published | $12.1M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 372,763 | 3,660 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ON Semiconductor | SweGaN |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ON Semiconductor | SweGaN |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | ON Semiconductor | SweGaN |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“EverythingRF: SweGaN Doubles Orders in First Half of 2024 and Launches High-Capacity GaN-on-SiC Production Facility.”r/ResilientPNT
ON Semiconductor vs SweGaN: common questions
Which is better, ON Semiconductor or SweGaN?
On our 0-100 score SweGaN rates higher (60/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ON Semiconductor and SweGaN compare on the numbers?
ON Semiconductor leads on domain rating (78/100 against 28/100), headcount (15,493 against 37), LinkedIn following (372,763 against 3,660). SweGaN leads on our overall score (60/100 against 20/100).
What do real users say about ON Semiconductor and SweGaN?
SweGaN: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ResilientPNT.
Read the full ON Semiconductor review and pricing or the SweGaN review and pricing. You can also browse other ON Semiconductor alternatives we track.