Omilia vs Replicant
Omilia vs Replicant, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Omilia is on 58/100 and Replicant on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Omilia
- funding raised: $87.0M against $34.0M
Replicant
- our overall score: 63/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 49/100
At a glance
| Measure | Omilia | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Conversational AI for Customer Service. | Replicant automates enterprise customer service with AI-powered voice agents that handle complex conversations. |
| Category | Conversational AI, Customer Service, Enterprise Software, Artificial Intelligence | Enterprise, Customer Service, Transcription, Audio |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Athens, Greece | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Omilia | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 170 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.8% |
| Total funding | $87.0M | $34.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 14,495 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Omilia | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Omilia | Replicant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Omilia vs Replicant: common questions
Which is better, Omilia or Replicant?
On our 0-100 score Replicant rates higher (63/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Omilia and Replicant compare on the numbers?
Omilia leads on funding raised ($87.0M against $34.0M). Replicant leads on our overall score (63/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 36/100), domain rating (59/100 against 49/100).
Read the full Omilia review and pricing or the Replicant review and pricing. You can also browse other Omilia alternatives we track.