Olomon vs Tink
Olomon vs Tink, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Olomon is on 35/100 and Tink on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Olomon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Tink
- our overall score: 67/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 8/100
- funding raised: $299M against $2.6M
At a glance
| Measure | Olomon | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building the financial system of record for households. | European open banking platform enabling financial data access, payments, and financial service development. |
| Category | Fintech, Consumer Finance, Personal Finance Management, Financial Planning | Fintech, Open Banking, Payments, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, USA | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Olomon | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 328 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -28.1% |
| Total funding | $2.6M | $299M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 65,102 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Olomon | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 32/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 8/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Olomon | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Olomon vs Tink: common questions
Which is better, Olomon or Tink?
On our 0-100 score Tink rates higher (67/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Olomon and Tink compare on the numbers?
Tink leads on our overall score (67/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (35/100 against 21/100), domain rating (73/100 against 8/100), funding raised ($299M against $2.6M).
Read the full Olomon review and pricing or the Tink review and pricing. You can also browse other Olomon alternatives we track.