Okta vs Ping Identity
Okta vs Ping Identity, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Okta is on 70/100 and Ping Identity on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Okta
- our overall score: 70/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 45/100
- funding raised: $187M against $111M
Ping Identity
- headcount: 2,370 against 3
At a glance
| Measure | Okta | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based identity and access management platform for secure user authentication and application access. | Provider of identity security solutions for the digital enterprise. |
| Category | SaaS, Cybersecurity, Cloud, Agentic AI | Identity & Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Authentication |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Okta | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | 2,370 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +21.9% |
| Total funding | $187M | $111M |
| Latest round | IPO | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 160,033 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Okta | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 90/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Okta | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Okta vs Ping Identity: common questions
Which is better, Okta or Ping Identity?
On our 0-100 score Okta rates higher (70/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Okta and Ping Identity compare on the numbers?
Okta leads on our overall score (70/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 45/100), funding raised ($187M against $111M). Ping Identity leads on headcount (2,370 against 3).
Read the full Okta review and pricing or the Ping Identity review and pricing. You can also browse other Okta alternatives we track.