Obsidian Security vs Pynt
Obsidian Security vs Pynt, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Obsidian Security is on 63/100 and Pynt on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Obsidian Security
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $85.0M against $6.0M
Pynt
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 40/100
At a glance
| Measure | Obsidian Security | Pynt |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Obsidian Security provides a cybersecurity platform focused on securing autonomous AI agents and their access to cloud applications. | Automated API security testing to proactively identify and eliminate complex application security risks. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, AI Agent, SaaS Security | Cybersecurity, AppSec, Enterprise, API |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Obsidian Security | Pynt |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 17 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.2% |
| Total funding | $85.0M | $6.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,775 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Obsidian Security | Pynt |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Obsidian Security | Pynt |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Obsidian Security vs Pynt: common questions
Which is better, Obsidian Security or Pynt?
On our 0-100 score Obsidian Security rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Obsidian Security and Pynt compare on the numbers?
Obsidian Security leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($85.0M against $6.0M). Pynt leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 40/100).
Read the full Obsidian Security review and pricing or the Pynt review and pricing. You can also browse other Obsidian Security alternatives we track.