Oak vs Zero Networks
Oak vs Zero Networks, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Oak is on 65/100 and Zero Networks on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Oak
- our overall score: 65/100 against 60/100
Zero Networks
- domain rating: 62/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 182 against 57
- funding raised: $100M against $60.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,695 against 439
At a glance
| Measure | Oak | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Oak is an Israeli identity management startup that has emerged from stealth, providing an AI-native Identity Operating System for enterprises. | Automated zero trust network segmentation and remote access platform. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Identity Governance, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Network, Enterprise, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2025 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Oak | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 57 | 182 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +58.1% |
| Total funding | $60.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 439 | 12,695 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Oak | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Oak | Zero Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Alpinejs, Bootstrap |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Oak vs Zero Networks: common questions
Which is better, Oak or Zero Networks?
On our 0-100 score Oak rates higher (65/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Oak and Zero Networks compare on the numbers?
Oak leads on our overall score (65/100 against 60/100). Zero Networks leads on domain rating (62/100 against 1/100), headcount (182 against 57), funding raised ($100M against $60.0M), LinkedIn following (12,695 against 439).
Read the full Oak review and pricing or the Zero Networks review and pricing. You can also browse other Oak alternatives we track.