Oak vs Skybox Security
Oak vs Skybox Security, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Oak is on 65/100 and Skybox Security on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Oak
- our overall score: 65/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 37/100
Skybox Security
- domain rating: 72/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 506 against 57
- funding raised: $240M against $60.0M
- LinkedIn following: 52,901 against 439
At a glance
| Measure | Oak | Skybox Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Oak is an Israeli identity management startup that has emerged from stealth, providing an AI-native Identity Operating System for enterprises. | Tufin provides a security policy management platform that automates network security changes and ensures continuous compliance across hybrid environments. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Identity Governance, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Security Policy Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2025 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Oak | Skybox Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 57 | 506 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +10.1% |
| Total funding | $60.0M | $240M |
| Latest round | Seed | Private Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $40.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 439 | 52,901 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Oak | Skybox Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Oak | Skybox Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Discourse |
Oak vs Skybox Security: common questions
Which is better, Oak or Skybox Security?
On our 0-100 score Oak rates higher (65/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Oak and Skybox Security compare on the numbers?
Oak leads on our overall score (65/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 37/100). Skybox Security leads on domain rating (72/100 against 1/100), headcount (506 against 57), funding raised ($240M against $60.0M), LinkedIn following (52,901 against 439).
Read the full Oak review and pricing or the Skybox Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Oak alternatives we track.