Nuna vs PatientPing
Nuna vs PatientPing, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nuna is on 63/100 and PatientPing on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Nuna
- headcount: 455 against 353
- funding raised: $290M against $65.0M
PatientPing
- domain rating: 69/100 against 42/100
- LinkedIn following: 21,387 against 10,521
At a glance
| Measure | Nuna | PatientPing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Healthcare analytics company making high-quality, affordable healthcare accessible through a data platform. | Real-time patient data sharing platform for healthcare providers to improve care coordination. |
| Category | HealthTech, Healthcare Analytics, Data Platform, Clinical Trials | HealthTech, MedTech, Clinical Trials, Telemedicine |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nuna | PatientPing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 455 | 353 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $290M | $65.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,521 | 21,387 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nuna | PatientPing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 42/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nuna | PatientPing |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Nuna vs PatientPing: common questions
Which is better, Nuna or PatientPing?
On our 0-100 score Nuna rates higher (63/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nuna and PatientPing compare on the numbers?
Nuna leads on headcount (455 against 353), funding raised ($290M against $65.0M). PatientPing leads on domain rating (69/100 against 42/100), LinkedIn following (21,387 against 10,521).
Read the full Nuna review and pricing or the PatientPing review and pricing. You can also browse other Nuna alternatives we track.