nsKnox vs Pipl
nsKnox vs Pipl, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: nsKnox is on 57/100 and Pipl on 55/100.
Where each one leads
nsKnox
- headcount growth: -1.9% against -14.4%
Pipl
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 155 against 46
- LinkedIn following: 7,920 against 5,312
At a glance
| Measure | nsKnox | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | nsKnox provides corporate payment security solutions to protect organizations and banks from cyber-fraud and financial losses. | Pipl provides identity verification and fraud prevention solutions by leveraging a vast index of online identity data. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Payment Fraud Detection, Payments | Enterprise, Verification, Fraud, Identity Verification |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | nsKnox | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 46 | 155 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -1.9% | -14.4% |
| Total funding | $19.0M | $19.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,312 | 7,920 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | nsKnox | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | nsKnox | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
nsKnox vs Pipl: common questions
Which is better, nsKnox or Pipl?
On our 0-100 score nsKnox rates higher (57/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do nsKnox and Pipl compare on the numbers?
nsKnox leads on headcount growth (-1.9% against -14.4%). Pipl leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 46/100), domain rating (72/100 against 47/100), headcount (155 against 46), LinkedIn following (7,920 against 5,312).
Read the full nsKnox review and pricing or the Pipl review and pricing. You can also browse other nsKnox alternatives we track.