Nozomi Networks vs SCADAfence
Nozomi Networks vs SCADAfence, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nozomi Networks is on 71/100 and SCADAfence on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Nozomi Networks
- our overall score: 71/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 393 against 29
- LinkedIn following: 99,422 against 9,190
SCADAfence
- domain rating: 88/100 against 73/100
At a glance
| Measure | Nozomi Networks | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity and operational visibility for industrial control systems. | Industrial cybersecurity and OT/IoT solutions for critical infrastructure and manufacturing. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, Threat Detection, Operational Technology Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Industrial IoT, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | services |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nozomi Networks | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 393 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -20.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 99,422 | 9,190 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nozomi Networks | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 71/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 52/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 7/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nozomi Networks | SCADAfence |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Nozomi Networks vs SCADAfence: common questions
Which is better, Nozomi Networks or SCADAfence?
On our 0-100 score Nozomi Networks rates higher (71/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nozomi Networks and SCADAfence compare on the numbers?
Nozomi Networks leads on our overall score (71/100 against 55/100), headcount (393 against 29), LinkedIn following (99,422 against 9,190). SCADAfence leads on domain rating (88/100 against 73/100).
Read the full Nozomi Networks review and pricing or the SCADAfence review and pricing. You can also browse other Nozomi Networks alternatives we track.