Nota vs Scrapinghub (now Zyte)
Nota vs Scrapinghub (now Zyte), compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nota is on 51/100 and Scrapinghub (now Zyte) on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Nota
- funding raised: $60.3M against $4.5M
Scrapinghub (now Zyte)
- our overall score: 60/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 235 against 163
- LinkedIn following: 73,719 against 4,370
At a glance
| Measure | Nota | Scrapinghub (now Zyte) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hardware-aware AI Model Optimization Platform and AI solutions | Provides a full-stack web scraping API and data extraction services for businesses. |
| Category | Document Understanding, AI, Automation, Data Extraction | Web Scraping, Data Extraction, Data Services, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Dublin, Ireland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nota | Scrapinghub (now Zyte) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 163 | 235 |
| Total funding | $60.3M | $4.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Debt Financing |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,370 | 73,719 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nota | Scrapinghub (now Zyte) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nota | Scrapinghub (now Zyte) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Squarespace | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Nota vs Scrapinghub (now Zyte): common questions
Which is better, Nota or Scrapinghub (now Zyte)?
On our 0-100 score Scrapinghub (now Zyte) rates higher (60/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nota and Scrapinghub (now Zyte) compare on the numbers?
Nota leads on funding raised ($60.3M against $4.5M). Scrapinghub (now Zyte) leads on our overall score (60/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 48/100), domain rating (72/100 against 46/100), headcount (235 against 163), LinkedIn following (73,719 against 4,370).
Read the full Nota review and pricing or the Scrapinghub (now Zyte) review and pricing. You can also browse other Nota alternatives we track.