Norrsken vs Systemiq Capital
Norrsken vs Systemiq Capital, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Norrsken is on 57/100 and Systemiq Capital on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Norrsken
- our overall score: 57/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 121 against 51
Systemiq Capital
- domain rating: 72/100 against 0/100
- funding raised: $100M against $63.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Norrsken | Systemiq Capital |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Driving Europe's transition to an 'electro-continent' through investment and advocacy. | A venture capital firm focused on scaling companies that deliver environmental and social impact. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Energy, Sustainability, Climate Tech | Venture Capital, Impact Investing, Sustainability, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2020 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Norrsken | Systemiq Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 121 | 51 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +22.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Series A | Fund II First Close |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 72,369 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Norrsken | Systemiq Capital |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 11/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Norrsken | Systemiq Capital |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Norrsken vs Systemiq Capital: common questions
Which is better, Norrsken or Systemiq Capital?
On our 0-100 score Norrsken rates higher (57/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Norrsken and Systemiq Capital compare on the numbers?
Norrsken leads on our overall score (57/100 against 38/100), headcount (121 against 51). Systemiq Capital leads on domain rating (72/100 against 0/100), funding raised ($100M against $63.0M).
Read the full Norrsken review and pricing or the Systemiq Capital review and pricing. You can also browse other Norrsken alternatives we track.