Noobaa vs Portworx
Noobaa vs Portworx, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Noobaa is on 41/100 and Portworx on 40/100.
Where each one leads
Noobaa
- domain rating: 97/100 against 73/100
Portworx
- headcount: 106 against 1
- funding raised: $35.5M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 13,635 against 375
At a glance
| Measure | Noobaa | Portworx |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | NooBaa provides an open-source, S3-compatible object storage platform for managing data across private and public clouds. | Cloud-native data services platform for Kubernetes, acquired by Pure Storage. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Storage, Software Defined (SD) | CloudTech & DevOps, SaaS, Containerization, Kubernetes |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Noobaa | Portworx |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 106 |
| Total funding | $5.0M | $35.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 375 | 13,635 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Noobaa | Portworx |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 12/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 30/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 97/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Noobaa | Portworx |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | Drift |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Noobaa | Portworx |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“@ZDNet: Red Hat buys hybrid-cloud, data-storage company NooBaa https://t.co/BJ8qCey5x7 by @sjvn.”r/newsbotTMT
Noobaa vs Portworx: common questions
Which is better, Noobaa or Portworx?
On our 0-100 score Noobaa rates higher (41/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Noobaa and Portworx compare on the numbers?
Noobaa leads on domain rating (97/100 against 73/100). Portworx leads on headcount (106 against 1), funding raised ($35.5M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (13,635 against 375).
What do real users say about Noobaa and Portworx?
Noobaa: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/newsbotTMT.
Read the full Noobaa review and pricing or the Portworx review and pricing. You can also browse other Noobaa alternatives we track.