Noname Security vs ThreatX
Noname Security vs ThreatX, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Noname Security is on 68/100 and ThreatX on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Noname Security
- our overall score: 68/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 380 against 14
- headcount growth: +1.2% against -52.2%
- funding raised: $225M against $53.7M
- LinkedIn following: 19,031 against 9,199
ThreatX
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Noname Security | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Comprehensive API security platform for proactive posture management, runtime security, and testing. | Cloud-native WAAP solution for API and application security, providing real-time visibility and protection against evolving threats. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, API, Data Leakage Prevention | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, API Security, Application Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Noname Security | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 380 | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.2% | -52.2% |
| Total funding | $225M | $53.7M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,031 | 9,199 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Noname Security | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Noname Security | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | AWS |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Noname Security vs ThreatX: common questions
Which is better, Noname Security or ThreatX?
On our 0-100 score Noname Security rates higher (68/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Noname Security and ThreatX compare on the numbers?
Noname Security leads on our overall score (68/100 against 56/100), domain rating (90/100 against 55/100), headcount (380 against 14), headcount growth (+1.2% against -52.2%), funding raised ($225M against $53.7M), LinkedIn following (19,031 against 9,199). ThreatX leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 25/100).
Read the full Noname Security review and pricing or the ThreatX review and pricing. You can also browse other Noname Security alternatives we track.