Noname Security vs Reblaze
Noname Security vs Reblaze, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Noname Security is on 68/100 and Reblaze on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Noname Security
- our overall score: 68/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 380 against 114
- LinkedIn following: 19,031 against 7,076
Reblaze
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Noname Security | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Comprehensive API security platform for proactive posture management, runtime security, and testing. | Cloud-based, fully managed WAF, DDoS, and API security solution for websites and web applications. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, API, Data Leakage Prevention | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, API, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Noname Security | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 380 | 114 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $225M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,031 | 7,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Noname Security | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Noname Security | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
What users say
| Measure | Noname Security | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“ShieldEye - Web Security Detection Extension. 🛡️ ShieldEye - Web Security Detection Extension 🎯 Overview ShieldEye is an open-source browser extension that detects and analyzes anti-bot solutions, CAPTCHA services, and security mechanisms”r/webscraping
Noname Security vs Reblaze: common questions
Which is better, Noname Security or Reblaze?
On our 0-100 score Noname Security rates higher (68/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Noname Security and Reblaze compare on the numbers?
Noname Security leads on our overall score (68/100 against 38/100), domain rating (90/100 against 73/100), headcount (380 against 114), LinkedIn following (19,031 against 7,076). Reblaze leads on agent readiness (43/100 against 25/100).
What do real users say about Noname Security and Reblaze?
Reblaze: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/webscraping.
Read the full Noname Security review and pricing or the Reblaze review and pricing. You can also browse other Noname Security alternatives we track.