Noname Security vs Pynt
Noname Security vs Pynt, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Noname Security is on 68/100 and Pynt on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Noname Security
- our overall score: 68/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 380 against 17
- funding raised: $225M against $6.0M
- LinkedIn following: 19,031 against 5,775
Pynt
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 25/100
- headcount growth: +2.2% against +1.2%
At a glance
| Measure | Noname Security | Pynt |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Comprehensive API security platform for proactive posture management, runtime security, and testing. | Automated API security testing to proactively identify and eliminate complex application security risks. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, API, Data Leakage Prevention | Cybersecurity, AppSec, Enterprise, API |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Noname Security | Pynt |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 380 | 17 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.2% | +2.2% |
| Total funding | $225M | $6.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,031 | 5,775 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Noname Security | Pynt |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Noname Security | Pynt |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Noname Security vs Pynt: common questions
Which is better, Noname Security or Pynt?
On our 0-100 score Noname Security rates higher (68/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Noname Security and Pynt compare on the numbers?
Noname Security leads on our overall score (68/100 against 53/100), domain rating (90/100 against 58/100), headcount (380 against 17), funding raised ($225M against $6.0M), LinkedIn following (19,031 against 5,775). Pynt leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 25/100), headcount growth (+2.2% against +1.2%).
Read the full Noname Security review and pricing or the Pynt review and pricing. You can also browse other Noname Security alternatives we track.