Noname Security vs PureSec
Noname Security vs PureSec, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Noname Security is on 68/100 and PureSec on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Noname Security
- our overall score: 68/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 380 against 3
- funding raised: $225M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 19,031 against 1,906
PureSec
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Noname Security | PureSec |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Comprehensive API security platform for proactive posture management, runtime security, and testing. | Global leader in serverless architecture security, enabling secure and reliable serverless applications. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, API, Data Leakage Prevention | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Development, Serverless |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Noname Security | PureSec |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 380 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $225M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 19,031 | 1,906 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Noname Security | PureSec |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 41/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Noname Security | PureSec |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Google Cloud |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Noname Security vs PureSec: common questions
Which is better, Noname Security or PureSec?
On our 0-100 score Noname Security rates higher (68/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Noname Security and PureSec compare on the numbers?
Noname Security leads on our overall score (68/100 against 55/100), headcount (380 against 3), funding raised ($225M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (19,031 against 1,906). PureSec leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 25/100).
Read the full Noname Security review and pricing or the PureSec review and pricing. You can also browse other Noname Security alternatives we track.