Nokod Security vs Quickbase
Nokod Security vs Quickbase, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nokod Security is on 56/100 and Quickbase on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Nokod Security
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 42/100
- headcount growth: +87.9% against -24.4%
Quickbase
- our overall score: 69/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 814 against 32
- funding raised: $1.0B against $8.0M
- LinkedIn following: 27,996 against 5,960
At a glance
| Measure | Nokod Security | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Application security platform for low-code/no-code and RPA applications. | Low-code application platform for work management, centralizing complex projects and processes. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, No Code, Application Security | Work Management, Low-Code Development, Application Platform, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nokod Security | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 32 | 814 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +87.9% | -24.4% |
| Total funding | $8.0M | $1.0B |
| Latest round | Seed | Acquisition |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,960 | 27,996 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nokod Security | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nokod Security | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Plausible, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Nokod Security vs Quickbase: common questions
Which is better, Nokod Security or Quickbase?
On our 0-100 score Quickbase rates higher (69/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nokod Security and Quickbase compare on the numbers?
Nokod Security leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 42/100), headcount growth (+87.9% against -24.4%). Quickbase leads on our overall score (69/100 against 56/100), domain rating (80/100 against 40/100), headcount (814 against 32), funding raised ($1.0B against $8.0M), LinkedIn following (27,996 against 5,960).
Read the full Nokod Security review and pricing or the Quickbase review and pricing. You can also browse other Nokod Security alternatives we track.