Nodalview vs QuintoAndar
Nodalview vs QuintoAndar, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nodalview is on 54/100 and QuintoAndar on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Nodalview
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
QuintoAndar
- our overall score: 59/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $744M against $10.1M
At a glance
| Measure | Nodalview | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Nodalview provides an AI-powered visual marketing platform for real estate agents. | Brazilian proptech platform simplifying real estate rentals and sales through technology. |
| Category | Real Estate Technology, Proptech, Visual Marketing, AI-powered Photography | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, Marketplace, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Brussels, Belgium | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nodalview | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $10.1M | $744M |
| Latest round | Later Stage VC | Series E (Extension) |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nodalview | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nodalview | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
Nodalview vs QuintoAndar: common questions
Which is better, Nodalview or QuintoAndar?
On our 0-100 score QuintoAndar rates higher (59/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nodalview and QuintoAndar compare on the numbers?
QuintoAndar leads on our overall score (59/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($744M against $10.1M).
Read the full Nodalview review and pricing or the QuintoAndar review and pricing. You can also browse other Nodalview alternatives we track.