noa vs PropTiger
noa vs PropTiger, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: noa is on 10/100 and PropTiger on 70/100.
Where each one leads
noa
- agent readiness: 32/100 against 22/100
PropTiger
- our overall score: 70/100 against 10/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 1/100
At a glance
| Measure | noa | PropTiger |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A London-based venture capital firm investing in early-stage technologies transforming the built world. | Online real estate platform for property search, home loans, and legal services in India. |
| Category | Proptech, Climate Tech, ConTech, Sustainability | Proptech, Real Estate, Marketplace, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Gurugram, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | noa | PropTiger |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,221 |
| Total funding | Not published | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 44,182 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | noa | PropTiger |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 10/100 | 70/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 36/100 |
| Search visibility | 8/100 | 84/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | noa | PropTiger |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js |
noa vs PropTiger: common questions
Which is better, noa or PropTiger?
On our 0-100 score PropTiger rates higher (70/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do noa and PropTiger compare on the numbers?
noa leads on agent readiness (32/100 against 22/100). PropTiger leads on our overall score (70/100 against 10/100), domain rating (60/100 against 1/100).
Read the full noa review and pricing or the PropTiger review and pricing. You can also browse other noa alternatives we track.