NFL.com vs SEMAFOR
NFL.com vs SEMAFOR, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: NFL.com is on 60/100 and SEMAFOR on 48/100.
Where each one leads
NFL.com
- our overall score: 60/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 7,583 against 163
- funding raised: $78.0M against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 660,339 against 29,706
SEMAFOR
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | NFL.com | SEMAFOR |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Official digital home of the National Football League, offering news, scores, schedules, and fantasy football. | A global intelligence news platform providing transparent, distilled views and diverse perspectives for a curious, global audience. |
| Category | Sports Tech, Media, Digital Content, Fantasy Sports | News Platform, Journalism, Global News, Media |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1994 | Not published |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | NFL.com | SEMAFOR |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7,583 | 163 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +12.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $78.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Debt financing | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 660,339 | 29,706 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | NFL.com | SEMAFOR |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 58/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | NFL.com | SEMAFOR |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Astro |
What users say
| Measure | NFL.com | SEMAFOR |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“[NFL.com] NFL Power Rankings, Week 9: Red-hot Lions take No. 1 spot from Chiefs; Commanders crack top five.”r/nfl
NFL.com vs SEMAFOR: common questions
Which is better, NFL.com or SEMAFOR?
On our 0-100 score NFL.com rates higher (60/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do NFL.com and SEMAFOR compare on the numbers?
NFL.com leads on our overall score (60/100 against 48/100), headcount (7,583 against 163), funding raised ($78.0M against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (660,339 against 29,706).
What do real users say about NFL.com and SEMAFOR?
NFL.com: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nfl.
Read the full NFL.com review and pricing or the SEMAFOR review and pricing. You can also browse other NFL.com alternatives we track.