NewOrbit vs Observable Space
NewOrbit vs Observable Space, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: NewOrbit is on 52/100 and Observable Space on 63/100.
Where each one leads
NewOrbit
- LinkedIn following: 14,584 against 3,039
Observable Space
- our overall score: 63/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 32/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 56 against 30
- funding raised: $101M against $28.5M
At a glance
| Measure | NewOrbit | Observable Space |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building satellites for very low Earth orbit (VLEO) to advance global connectivity and insight. | Enabling scalable, low-cost space-to-Earth laser communications. |
| Category | Aerospace, Satellite Technology, Space Technology, Hardware | Aerospace, Telecommunications, Hardware, SpaceTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2G |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Reading, United Kingdom | Adrian, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | NewOrbit | Observable Space |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | 56 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Open roles | Not published | 30 |
| Total funding | $28.5M | $101M |
| Latest round | Series A | debut funding round |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,584 | 3,039 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | NewOrbit | Observable Space |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | NewOrbit | Observable Space |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | NewOrbit | Observable Space |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 3 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“Los Angeles-based Observable Space closed a $90M Series A and announced a $94M U.S. Space Force contract to scale its optical sensing and laser communications platforms.”r/LosAngelesDevs
NewOrbit vs Observable Space: common questions
Which is better, NewOrbit or Observable Space?
On our 0-100 score Observable Space rates higher (63/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do NewOrbit and Observable Space compare on the numbers?
NewOrbit leads on LinkedIn following (14,584 against 3,039). Observable Space leads on our overall score (63/100 against 52/100), domain rating (32/100 against 26/100), headcount (56 against 30), funding raised ($101M against $28.5M).
What do real users say about NewOrbit and Observable Space?
Observable Space: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/LosAngelesDevs.
Read the full NewOrbit review and pricing or the Observable Space review and pricing. You can also browse other NewOrbit alternatives we track.