NeuroPace vs Tengable
NeuroPace vs Tengable, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: NeuroPace is on 67/100 and Tengable on 51/100.
Where each one leads
NeuroPace
- our overall score: 67/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 52/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 248 against 3
- funding raised: $475M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 32,261 against 881
Tengable
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | NeuroPace | Tengable |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops a brain-computer interface for treating epilepsy. | Self-powered nanogenerator implanted to restore touch sensation by stimulating sensory nerves. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, Brain-Computer Interface, Non-Invasive BCI | Healthcare, Electricity, Nanomaterial, Human Machine Interface |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 1997 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | NeuroPace | Tengable |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 248 | 3 |
| Total funding | $475M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | IPO | Seed |
| Valuation | $375M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 32,261 | 881 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | NeuroPace | Tengable |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 27/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | NeuroPace | Tengable |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
NeuroPace vs Tengable: common questions
Which is better, NeuroPace or Tengable?
On our 0-100 score NeuroPace rates higher (67/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do NeuroPace and Tengable compare on the numbers?
NeuroPace leads on our overall score (67/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 30/100), domain rating (52/100 against 5/100), headcount (248 against 3), funding raised ($475M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (32,261 against 881).
Read the full NeuroPace review and pricing or the Tengable review and pricing. You can also browse other NeuroPace alternatives we track.