NeuroPace vs Shockwave Medical
NeuroPace vs Shockwave Medical, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: NeuroPace is on 67/100 and Shockwave Medical on 66/100.
Where each one leads
NeuroPace
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 42/100
- funding raised: $475M against $200M
Shockwave Medical
- domain rating: 59/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 1,542 against 248
- LinkedIn following: 120,592 against 32,261
At a glance
| Measure | NeuroPace | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops a brain-computer interface for treating epilepsy. | Develops intravascular lithotripsy technology for treating calcified cardiovascular lesions. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, Brain-Computer Interface, Non-Invasive BCI | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Cardiovascular Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 1997 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | NeuroPace | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 248 | 1,542 |
| Total funding | $475M | $200M |
| Latest round | IPO | Series D |
| Valuation | $375M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 32,261 | 120,592 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | NeuroPace | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | NeuroPace | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
NeuroPace vs Shockwave Medical: common questions
Which is better, NeuroPace or Shockwave Medical?
On our 0-100 score NeuroPace rates higher (67/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do NeuroPace and Shockwave Medical compare on the numbers?
NeuroPace leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 42/100), funding raised ($475M against $200M). Shockwave Medical leads on domain rating (59/100 against 53/100), headcount (1,542 against 248), LinkedIn following (120,592 against 32,261).
Read the full NeuroPace review and pricing or the Shockwave Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other NeuroPace alternatives we track.