Neuralk vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc.
Neuralk vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc., compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Neuralk is on 53/100 and Thinking Machines Lab Inc. on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Neuralk
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 40/100
Thinking Machines Lab Inc.
- our overall score: 69/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 212 against 20
- funding raised: $2.0B against $4.0M
- LinkedIn following: 141,099 against 4,461
At a glance
| Measure | Neuralk | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Neuralk builds predictive AI for enterprises, offering tabular foundation models that deliver instant, accurate predictions on structured data without training. | Frontier AI lab building multimodal AI systems with customizable, collaborative capabilities for enterprise applications, focusing on human-AI collaboration and personalized AI. |
| Category | Foundation Model, Predictive AI, Tabular Data AI, Enterprise AI | Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Multimodal AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Neuralk | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 20 | 212 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +283.1% |
| Open roles | Not published | 34 |
| Total funding | $4.0M | $2.0B |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $12B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,461 | 141,099 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Neuralk | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Neuralk | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Neuralk | Thinking Machines Lab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Thinking Machines wants to build an AI that actually listens while it talks.”r/technology
Neuralk vs Thinking Machines Lab Inc.: common questions
Which is better, Neuralk or Thinking Machines Lab Inc.?
On our 0-100 score Thinking Machines Lab Inc. rates higher (69/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Neuralk and Thinking Machines Lab Inc. compare on the numbers?
Neuralk leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 40/100). Thinking Machines Lab Inc. leads on our overall score (69/100 against 53/100), domain rating (75/100 against 40/100), headcount (212 against 20), funding raised ($2.0B against $4.0M), LinkedIn following (141,099 against 4,461).
What do real users say about Neuralk and Thinking Machines Lab Inc.?
Thinking Machines Lab Inc.: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/technology.
Read the full Neuralk review and pricing or the Thinking Machines Lab Inc. review and pricing. You can also browse other Neuralk alternatives we track.