Neon vs Silk
Neon vs Silk, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Neon is on 70/100 and Silk on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Neon
- our overall score: 70/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $1.2B against $238M
- LinkedIn following: 17,984 against 5,024
Silk
- headcount: 490 against 156
At a glance
| Measure | Neon | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A serverless Postgres database with separation of storage and compute. | Silk provides a data virtualization platform for cloud workloads, accelerating performance without refactoring. |
| Category | Database, Serverless, Developer Tools, Cloud Infrastructure | Database, Enterprise, Optimization, Virtualization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Neon | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 156 | 490 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +25.0% |
| Total funding | $1.2B | $238M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series G |
| Valuation | $1.0B | $550M |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,984 | 5,024 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Neon | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (60/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Neon | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Neon vs Silk: common questions
Which is better, Neon or Silk?
On our 0-100 score Neon rates higher (70/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Neon and Silk compare on the numbers?
Neon leads on our overall score (70/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (60/100 against 21/100), domain rating (83/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($1.2B against $238M), LinkedIn following (17,984 against 5,024). Silk leads on headcount (490 against 156).
Read the full Neon review and pricing or the Silk review and pricing. You can also browse other Neon alternatives we track.