Neon vs ScyllaDB
Neon vs ScyllaDB, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Neon is on 70/100 and ScyllaDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Neon
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 73/100
- funding raised: $1.2B against $101M
ScyllaDB
- headcount: 225 against 156
- LinkedIn following: 28,743 against 17,984
At a glance
| Measure | Neon | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A serverless Postgres database with separation of storage and compute. | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. |
| Category | Database, Serverless, Developer Tools, Cloud Infrastructure | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Neon | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 156 | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.6% |
| Total funding | $1.2B | $101M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Debt |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,984 | 28,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Neon | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (60/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Neon | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Neon | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
Neon vs ScyllaDB: common questions
Which is better, Neon or ScyllaDB?
On our 0-100 score Neon rates higher (70/100 against 67/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Neon and ScyllaDB compare on the numbers?
Neon leads on agent readiness (60/100 against 46/100), domain rating (83/100 against 73/100), funding raised ($1.2B against $101M). ScyllaDB leads on headcount (225 against 156), LinkedIn following (28,743 against 17,984).
What do real users say about Neon and ScyllaDB?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full Neon review and pricing or the ScyllaDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Neon alternatives we track.