Native Teams vs Rippling
Native Teams vs Rippling, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Native Teams is on 60/100 and Rippling on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Native Teams
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Rippling
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 5,200 against 359
- funding raised: $500M against $14.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Native Teams | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides payroll and international worker support for SMEs and remote companies. | Rippling is a Sequoia-backed company since 2021. |
| Category | Not published | HR & Finance Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Native Teams | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 5,200 |
| Total funding | $14.5M | $500M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $14K |
| LinkedIn followers | 177,070 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Native Teams | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | C (63/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Native Teams | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager, Branch |
Native Teams vs Rippling: common questions
Which is better, Native Teams or Rippling?
On our 0-100 score Native Teams rates higher (60/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Native Teams and Rippling compare on the numbers?
Rippling leads on agent readiness (63/100 against 52/100), domain rating (84/100 against 58/100), headcount (5,200 against 359), funding raised ($500M against $14.5M).
Read the full Native Teams review and pricing or the Rippling review and pricing. You can also browse other Native Teams alternatives we track.