Native Teams vs Papaya Global
Native Teams vs Papaya Global, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Native Teams is on 60/100 and Papaya Global on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Native Teams
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 25/100
- LinkedIn following: 177,070 against 132,369
Papaya Global
- our overall score: 71/100 against 60/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 806 against 359
- funding raised: $438M against $14.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Native Teams | Papaya Global |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides payroll and international worker support for SMEs and remote companies. | Global payroll and payments platform for enterprises, simplifying international workforce management. |
| Category | Not published | Fintech, Payments, Payroll, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Native Teams | Papaya Global |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 806 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +1.9% |
| Total funding | $14.5M | $438M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 177,070 | 132,369 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Native Teams | Papaya Global |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 83/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Native Teams | Papaya Global |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Native Teams vs Papaya Global: common questions
Which is better, Native Teams or Papaya Global?
On our 0-100 score Papaya Global rates higher (71/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Native Teams and Papaya Global compare on the numbers?
Native Teams leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 25/100), LinkedIn following (177,070 against 132,369). Papaya Global leads on our overall score (71/100 against 60/100), domain rating (73/100 against 58/100), headcount (806 against 359), funding raised ($438M against $14.5M).
Read the full Native Teams review and pricing or the Papaya Global review and pricing. You can also browse other Native Teams alternatives we track.