Native Teams vs Oyster HR
Native Teams vs Oyster HR, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Native Teams is on 60/100 and Oyster HR on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Native Teams
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Oyster HR
- our overall score: 70/100 against 60/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 600 against 359
- funding raised: $501M against $14.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Native Teams | Oyster HR |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides payroll and international worker support for SMEs and remote companies. | Global employment platform enabling companies to hire, pay, and care for distributed teams worldwide. |
| Category | Not published | HR Tech, Global Employment, Employer of Record, Payroll Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Charlotte, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Native Teams | Oyster HR |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 600 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.0% |
| Total funding | $14.5M | $501M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D Extension |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 177,070 | 147,872 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Native Teams | Oyster HR |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 51/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Native Teams | Oyster HR |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Native Teams | Oyster HR |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
Native Teams vs Oyster HR: common questions
Which is better, Native Teams or Oyster HR?
On our 0-100 score Oyster HR rates higher (70/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Native Teams and Oyster HR compare on the numbers?
Oyster HR leads on our overall score (70/100 against 60/100), domain rating (73/100 against 58/100), headcount (600 against 359), funding raised ($501M against $14.5M).
Read the full Native Teams review and pricing or the Oyster HR review and pricing. You can also browse other Native Teams alternatives we track.