Natera vs Texas Oncology
Natera vs Texas Oncology, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Natera is on 41/100 and Texas Oncology on 25/100.
Where each one leads
Natera
- our overall score: 41/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 5,831 against 4,014
- LinkedIn following: 225,919 against 24,581
Texas Oncology
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Natera | Texas Oncology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Natera is a global leader in cell-free DNA testing, providing genetic testing services for reproductive health, oncology, and organ transplantation. | A network of cancer care providers offering comprehensive treatment and research in Texas. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Genomics, Clinical Trials | HealthTech, MedTech, Oncology, Cancer Care |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2004 | 1986 |
| Headquarters | Austin, United States | Dallas, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Natera | Texas Oncology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,831 | 4,014 |
| Total funding | $54.6M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 225,919 | 24,581 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Natera | Texas Oncology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 25/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Natera | Texas Oncology |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Natera vs Texas Oncology: common questions
Which is better, Natera or Texas Oncology?
On our 0-100 score Natera rates higher (41/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Natera and Texas Oncology compare on the numbers?
Natera leads on our overall score (41/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 35/100), domain rating (72/100 against 64/100), headcount (5,831 against 4,014), LinkedIn following (225,919 against 24,581).
Read the full Natera review and pricing or the Texas Oncology review and pricing. You can also browse other Natera alternatives we track.