Nanox Vision vs Zsquare
Nanox Vision vs Zsquare, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nanox Vision is on 52/100 and Zsquare on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Nanox Vision
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 118 against 30
- funding raised: $105M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 9,547 against 993
Zsquare
- our overall score: 56/100 against 52/100
- headcount growth: +5.7% against -26.3%
At a glance
| Measure | Nanox Vision | Zsquare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing a commercial-grade digital X-ray source for real-world medical imaging applications to reduce costs. | Zsquare develops the world's thinnest, high-resolution micro-endoscopes for various medical applications, enabling disposable and cost-effective procedures. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, MedTech, HealthTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Endoscopy, 3D |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Neve Ilan, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nanox Vision | Zsquare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 118 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -26.3% | +5.7% |
| Total funding | $105M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series B2 | Not published |
| Valuation | $600M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,547 | 993 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nanox Vision | Zsquare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 20/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nanox Vision | Zsquare |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Nanox Vision vs Zsquare: common questions
Which is better, Nanox Vision or Zsquare?
On our 0-100 score Zsquare rates higher (56/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nanox Vision and Zsquare compare on the numbers?
Nanox Vision leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), domain rating (55/100 against 20/100), headcount (118 against 30), funding raised ($105M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (9,547 against 993). Zsquare leads on our overall score (56/100 against 52/100), headcount growth (+5.7% against -26.3%).
Read the full Nanox Vision review and pricing or the Zsquare review and pricing. You can also browse other Nanox Vision alternatives we track.