Nanox Vision vs Zebra Medical Vision
Nanox Vision vs Zebra Medical Vision, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nanox Vision is on 52/100 and Zebra Medical Vision on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Nanox Vision
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 118 against 56
- funding raised: $105M against $50.0M
Zebra Medical Vision
- our overall score: 61/100 against 52/100
- LinkedIn following: 13,992 against 9,547
At a glance
| Measure | Nanox Vision | Zebra Medical Vision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing a commercial-grade digital X-ray source for real-world medical imaging applications to reduce costs. | Zebra Medical Vision develops AI-powered medical imaging analysis tools to help radiologists detect and diagnose diseases earlier. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, MedTech, HealthTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Radiology, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Neve Ilan, Israel | Shefayim, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nanox Vision | Zebra Medical Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 118 | 56 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -26.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $105M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Series B2 | Series C |
| Valuation | $600M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,547 | 13,992 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nanox Vision | Zebra Medical Vision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 17/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nanox Vision | Zebra Medical Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Nanox Vision vs Zebra Medical Vision: common questions
Which is better, Nanox Vision or Zebra Medical Vision?
On our 0-100 score Zebra Medical Vision rates higher (61/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nanox Vision and Zebra Medical Vision compare on the numbers?
Nanox Vision leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 22/100), headcount (118 against 56), funding raised ($105M against $50.0M). Zebra Medical Vision leads on our overall score (61/100 against 52/100), LinkedIn following (13,992 against 9,547).
Read the full Nanox Vision review and pricing or the Zebra Medical Vision review and pricing. You can also browse other Nanox Vision alternatives we track.