Nanox Vision vs RealView Imaging
Nanox Vision vs RealView Imaging, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nanox Vision is on 52/100 and RealView Imaging on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Nanox Vision
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 118 against 20
- funding raised: $105M against $25.0M
- LinkedIn following: 9,547 against 1,945
RealView Imaging
- our overall score: 56/100 against 52/100
- headcount growth: +13.9% against -26.3%
At a glance
| Measure | Nanox Vision | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing a commercial-grade digital X-ray source for real-world medical imaging applications to reduce costs. | Pioneering interactive live holography for medical imaging applications, providing physicians with a unique natural user experience. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, MedTech, HealthTech | Healthcare, Hologram, Augmented Reality (AR), 3D |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2012 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Neve Ilan, Israel | Yokneam Illit, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nanox Vision | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 118 | 20 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -26.3% | +13.9% |
| Total funding | $105M | $25.0M |
| Latest round | Series B2 | Series C |
| Valuation | $600M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,547 | 1,945 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nanox Vision | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nanox Vision | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Nanox Vision | RealView Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Israeli startup RealView Imaging is using three-dimensional holographic imaging to revolutionise medical training.”r/Futurology
Nanox Vision vs RealView Imaging: common questions
Which is better, Nanox Vision or RealView Imaging?
On our 0-100 score RealView Imaging rates higher (56/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nanox Vision and RealView Imaging compare on the numbers?
Nanox Vision leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 30/100), domain rating (55/100 against 30/100), headcount (118 against 20), funding raised ($105M against $25.0M), LinkedIn following (9,547 against 1,945). RealView Imaging leads on our overall score (56/100 against 52/100), headcount growth (+13.9% against -26.3%).
What do real users say about Nanox Vision and RealView Imaging?
RealView Imaging: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Futurology.
Read the full Nanox Vision review and pricing or the RealView Imaging review and pricing. You can also browse other Nanox Vision alternatives we track.