NanoGraf vs Tesvolt
NanoGraf vs Tesvolt, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: NanoGraf is on 39/100 and Tesvolt on 61/100.
Where each one leads
NanoGraf
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 32/100
- funding raised: $65.0M against $47.8M
Tesvolt
- our overall score: 61/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | NanoGraf | Tesvolt |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Advanced battery materials company developing high-energy silicon-anode technology for lithium-ion batteries. | Develops and delivers holistic energy systems for commercial businesses, combining battery storage with intelligent energy management. |
| Category | Energy Storage, Battery Technology, Cleantech, Advanced Materials | Energy Storage, Battery Technology, Smart Grid, Renewable Energy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, software, services |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, United States | Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | NanoGraf | Tesvolt |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 161 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -18.6% |
| Total funding | $65.0M | $47.8M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 17,972 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | NanoGraf | Tesvolt |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | NanoGraf | Tesvolt |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Squarespace | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | PHP |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
NanoGraf vs Tesvolt: common questions
Which is better, NanoGraf or Tesvolt?
On our 0-100 score Tesvolt rates higher (61/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do NanoGraf and Tesvolt compare on the numbers?
NanoGraf leads on agent readiness (43/100 against 32/100), funding raised ($65.0M against $47.8M). Tesvolt leads on our overall score (61/100 against 39/100), domain rating (58/100 against 38/100).
Read the full NanoGraf review and pricing or the Tesvolt review and pricing. You can also browse other NanoGraf alternatives we track.