Nano Dimension vs PhosPrint
Nano Dimension vs PhosPrint, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nano Dimension is on 49/100 and PhosPrint on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Nano Dimension
- headcount: 221 against 10
- funding raised: $18.7M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 32,271 against 1,569
PhosPrint
- our overall score: 53/100 against 49/100
At a glance
| Measure | Nano Dimension | PhosPrint |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Nano Dimension provides intelligent machines for the fabrication of Additively Manufactured Electronics (AME). | Biotech startup developing laser bioprinting systems for regenerative medicine and biosensor applications. |
| Category | 3D Printing, Manufacturing, Electronics, Printed Circuit Board (PCB) | Biotech, MedTech, HealthTech, 3D Printing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Ness Ziona, Israel | Athens, Greece |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nano Dimension | PhosPrint |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 221 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $18.7M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Post-IPO | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 32,271 | 1,569 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nano Dimension | PhosPrint |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nano Dimension | PhosPrint |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
What users say
| Measure | Nano Dimension | PhosPrint |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Feels like Nano Dimension isn’t really Nano Dimension anymore. After selling off its original AME product line and moving in this Markforged-style direction, it comes across as a completely different company than what many of us originally ”r/NNDM
Nano Dimension vs PhosPrint: common questions
Which is better, Nano Dimension or PhosPrint?
On our 0-100 score PhosPrint rates higher (53/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nano Dimension and PhosPrint compare on the numbers?
Nano Dimension leads on headcount (221 against 10), funding raised ($18.7M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (32,271 against 1,569). PhosPrint leads on our overall score (53/100 against 49/100).
What do real users say about Nano Dimension and PhosPrint?
Nano Dimension: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/NNDM.
Read the full Nano Dimension review and pricing or the PhosPrint review and pricing. You can also browse other Nano Dimension alternatives we track.