Nango vs Zapier

Nango vs Zapier, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nango is on 40/100 and Zapier on 77/100.

Nango logo
NangoNango is an open-source platform for product integrations that provides a unified API for connecting to over 500 services and supports tool-calling for AI agents.
Try Nango
Zapier logo
ZapierZapier automates workflows by connecting web applications, enabling users to move data and automate tasks without coding.
Try Zapier

Where each one leads

Nango

Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.

Zapier

  • our overall score: 77/100 against 40/100
  • agent readiness: 71/100 against 52/100
  • domain rating: 91/100 against 65/100
  • headcount: 1,447 against 18
  • LinkedIn following: 360,432 against 4,487

At a glance

MeasureNangoZapier
What it isNango is an open-source platform for product integrations that provides a unified API for connecting to over 500 services and supports tool-calling for AI agents.Zapier automates workflows by connecting web applications, enabling users to move data and automate tasks without coding.
CategoryAPI Platform, Developer Tools, Open Source, Integration PlatformWorkflow Automation, Application Integration, Low-Code Development, No-Code Development
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingPlatformPlatform
FoundedNot published2011
HeadquartersUnknown, UnknownSan Francisco, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureNangoZapier
Employees181,447
Headcount growthLast 12 monthsNot published+17.9%
Total fundingNot published$1.3B
Latest roundNot publishedSeries C
ValuationNot published$5.0B
LinkedIn followers4,487360,432

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureNangoZapier
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating40/10077/100
Traction13/10060/100
TeamNot published70/100
CommunityNot published20/100
Search visibility37/10066/100
Quality58/10087/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (52/100)B (71/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10065/10091/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureNangoZapier
HostingAWSVercel
CDNCloudFrontVercel
FrameworksTailwind CSSNext.js
AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Tag Manager
Support stackNot detectedZendesk
Open sourceYesNo
Self-hostableYesNo

What users say

MeasureNangoZapier
Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHubNot published5.0/5 from 1 vote
Reddit sentimentThreads we track3 positive, 1 negative across 4 threadsNot published
Nango
Remember this post? Well I've personally used Nango and it's actually pretty awesome. So awesome in fact, that I've recently been devoting myself to loudly questioning why anyone would pay money to walled gardens like Merge and Finch ($65 a
r/PostgreSQL

Nango vs Zapier: common questions

Which is better, Nango or Zapier?

On our 0-100 score Zapier rates higher (77/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Nango and Zapier compare on the numbers?

Zapier leads on our overall score (77/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (71/100 against 52/100), domain rating (91/100 against 65/100), headcount (1,447 against 18), LinkedIn following (360,432 against 4,487).

What do real users say about Nango and Zapier?

Nango: 3 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PostgreSQL.

Read the full Nango review and pricing or the Zapier review and pricing. You can also browse other Nango alternatives we track.