Namirial vs PlainID
Namirial vs PlainID, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Namirial is on 55/100 and PlainID on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Namirial
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 600 against 93
- funding raised: $134M against $88.0M
PlainID
- our overall score: 63/100 against 55/100
At a glance
| Measure | Namirial | PlainID |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global provider of digital trust services including electronic signatures, registered electronic delivery, and digital identity. | Enterprise authorization platform for data, APIs, and AI, powered by Policy Based Access Control (PBAC). |
| Category | Digital Trust, Electronic Signatures, Identity Management, Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Authorization, Identity Management, Identity & Access |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2000 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Senigallia, Italy | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Namirial | PlainID |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 600 | 93 |
| Total funding | $134M | $88.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $300M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 23,482 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Namirial | PlainID |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Namirial | PlainID |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Namirial vs PlainID: common questions
Which is better, Namirial or PlainID?
On our 0-100 score PlainID rates higher (63/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Namirial and PlainID compare on the numbers?
Namirial leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 39/100), domain rating (71/100 against 55/100), headcount (600 against 93), funding raised ($134M against $88.0M). PlainID leads on our overall score (63/100 against 55/100).
Read the full Namirial review and pricing or the PlainID review and pricing. You can also browse other Namirial alternatives we track.