Multiplier vs Native Teams
Multiplier vs Native Teams, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Multiplier is on 46/100 and Native Teams on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Multiplier
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Native Teams
- our overall score: 60/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 28/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 11/100
- funding raised: $14.5M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Multiplier | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global payroll and HR platform for hiring and managing international teams. | Provides payroll and international worker support for SMEs and remote companies. |
| Category | HR Tech, Global Payroll, Employer of Record, International Hiring | Not published |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Singapore, Singapore | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Multiplier | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 359 |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $14.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 177,070 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Multiplier | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (28/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 11/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Multiplier | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Multiplier vs Native Teams: common questions
Which is better, Multiplier or Native Teams?
On our 0-100 score Native Teams rates higher (60/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Multiplier and Native Teams compare on the numbers?
Native Teams leads on our overall score (60/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 28/100), domain rating (58/100 against 11/100), funding raised ($14.5M against $10.0M).
Read the full Multiplier review and pricing or the Native Teams review and pricing. You can also browse other Multiplier alternatives we track.