mPulse vs Phreesia
mPulse vs Phreesia, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: mPulse is on 56/100 and Phreesia on 61/100.
Where each one leads
mPulse
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Phreesia
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 1,532 against 632
- funding raised: $120M against $31.0M
- LinkedIn following: 68,147 against 10,992
At a glance
| Measure | mPulse | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Personalized mobile engagement platform for healthcare providers. | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Patient Engagement, Digital Health | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | mPulse | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 632 | 1,532 |
| Total funding | $31.0M | $120M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,992 | 68,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | mPulse | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | mPulse | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
mPulse vs Phreesia: common questions
Which is better, mPulse or Phreesia?
On our 0-100 score Phreesia rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do mPulse and Phreesia compare on the numbers?
Phreesia leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100), domain rating (71/100 against 60/100), headcount (1,532 against 632), funding raised ($120M against $31.0M), LinkedIn following (68,147 against 10,992).
Read the full mPulse review and pricing or the Phreesia review and pricing. You can also browse other mPulse alternatives we track.