Monte Carlo vs Swimm
Monte Carlo vs Swimm, compared side by side on 25 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Monte Carlo is on 70/100 and Swimm on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Monte Carlo
- our overall score: 70/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 64/100
- headcount: 549 against 61
- headcount growth: +31.0% against +2.4%
- funding raised: $236M against $27.6M
- LinkedIn following: 40,281 against 9,161
Swimm
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Monte Carlo | Swimm |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Data observability platform for data reliability and quality. | Application understanding platform for modernizing and maintaining legacy code. |
| Category | Enterprise, Data, Development, Artificial Intelligence | Enterprise, Development, Knowledge Management, Application Understanding Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Monte Carlo | Swimm |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 549 | 61 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +31.0% | +2.4% |
| Total funding | $236M | $27.6M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 40,281 | 9,161 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Monte Carlo | Swimm |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 55/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Monte Carlo | Swimm |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Monte Carlo vs Swimm: common questions
Which is better, Monte Carlo or Swimm?
On our 0-100 score Monte Carlo rates higher (70/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 25 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Monte Carlo and Swimm compare on the numbers?
Monte Carlo leads on our overall score (70/100 against 57/100), domain rating (72/100 against 64/100), headcount (549 against 61), headcount growth (+31.0% against +2.4%), funding raised ($236M against $27.6M), LinkedIn following (40,281 against 9,161).
Read the full Monte Carlo review and pricing or the Swimm review and pricing. You can also browse other Monte Carlo alternatives we track.