MoneyMan vs StoneCo
MoneyMan vs StoneCo, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: MoneyMan is on 54/100 and StoneCo on 67/100.
Where each one leads
MoneyMan
- agent readiness: 33/100 against 21/100
StoneCo
- our overall score: 67/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 13,867 against 387
- headcount growth: +3.3% against +1.4%
- funding raised: $1.5B against $20.0M
- LinkedIn following: 2,482,372 against 34,023
At a glance
| Measure | MoneyMan | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ID Finance provides accessible financial services and personal well-being solutions through its MoneyMan app. | Brazilian fintech providing integrated financial and software solutions for merchants of all sizes. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Digital Payments, Consumer App | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Limassol, Cyprus | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | MoneyMan | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 387 | 13,867 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.4% | +3.3% |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $1.5B |
| Latest round | Series B | IPO |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,023 | 2,482,372 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | MoneyMan | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | MoneyMan | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | MoneyMan | StoneCo |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 3 negative across 4 threads | 1 positive, 3 negative across 4 threads |
“La queja principal y más grave contra Moneyman es la aplicación de intereses usurarios y excesivamente altos, que se disparan tras el primer préstamo o ante el menor retraso en el pago. Esta situación se ve agravada por la práctica de ingre”r/PrestamoPersonal
“StoneCo is a fairly dope SA fintech company with quality financials yet rapidly increasing short interest. The dumb fucks who think they can chip away at this little gem deserve to be eaten alive by the intrepid marketeers going in on share”r/wallstreetbets
MoneyMan vs StoneCo: common questions
Which is better, MoneyMan or StoneCo?
On our 0-100 score StoneCo rates higher (67/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do MoneyMan and StoneCo compare on the numbers?
MoneyMan leads on agent readiness (33/100 against 21/100). StoneCo leads on our overall score (67/100 against 54/100), domain rating (53/100 against 35/100), headcount (13,867 against 387), headcount growth (+3.3% against +1.4%), funding raised ($1.5B against $20.0M), LinkedIn following (2,482,372 against 34,023).
What do real users say about MoneyMan and StoneCo?
MoneyMan: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/PrestamoPersonal. StoneCo: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/wallstreetbets.
Read the full MoneyMan review and pricing or the StoneCo review and pricing. You can also browse other MoneyMan alternatives we track.