Mobileye vs Ottopia
Mobileye vs Ottopia, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mobileye is on 78/100 and Ottopia on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Mobileye
- our overall score: 78/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 3,779 against 34
- headcount growth: +11.6% against -9.8%
- funding raised: $1.4B against $26.5M
- LinkedIn following: 148,545 against 7,345
Ottopia
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mobileye | Ottopia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in autonomous driving technology and ADAS chips, providing vision-based sensing and AI software for vehicles worldwide. | Teleoperations software platform enabling driverless experiences by combining AI and human drivers. |
| Category | Automotive, Autonomous, Autonomous Vehicles, ADAS | Automotive, Autonomous, Teleoperation, Industrial |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 1999 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Jerusalem, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mobileye | Ottopia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,779 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +11.6% | -9.8% |
| Total funding | $1.4B | $26.5M |
| Latest round | IPO | Series A |
| Valuation | $10B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 148,545 | 7,345 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mobileye | Ottopia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 78/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 55/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mobileye | Ottopia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Nuxt | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Mobileye vs Ottopia: common questions
Which is better, Mobileye or Ottopia?
On our 0-100 score Mobileye rates higher (78/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mobileye and Ottopia compare on the numbers?
Mobileye leads on our overall score (78/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 35/100), domain rating (73/100 against 31/100), headcount (3,779 against 34), headcount growth (+11.6% against -9.8%), funding raised ($1.4B against $26.5M), LinkedIn following (148,545 against 7,345).
Read the full Mobileye review and pricing or the Ottopia review and pricing. You can also browse other Mobileye alternatives we track.