MobileODT vs Nanox Vision
MobileODT vs Nanox Vision, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: MobileODT is on 46/100 and Nanox Vision on 52/100.
Where each one leads
MobileODT
- headcount growth: -18.9% against -26.3%
Nanox Vision
- our overall score: 52/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 118 against 9
- funding raised: $105M against $13.5M
- LinkedIn following: 9,547 against 4,662
At a glance
| Measure | MobileODT | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Liger Medical develops breakthrough optical diagnostic devices and software for early cancer detection and other medical purposes. | Developing a commercial-grade digital X-ray source for real-world medical imaging applications to reduce costs. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Cancer, Clinical | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, MedTech, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Neve Ilan, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | MobileODT | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 118 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -18.9% | -26.3% |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $105M |
| Latest round | Grant | Series B2 |
| Valuation | Not published | $600M |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,662 | 9,547 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | MobileODT | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 45/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | MobileODT | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | MobileODT | Nanox Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 3 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“MobileODT Technology Improves Cervical Cancer Detection Rates - Study.”r/prnewswire
MobileODT vs Nanox Vision: common questions
Which is better, MobileODT or Nanox Vision?
On our 0-100 score Nanox Vision rates higher (52/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do MobileODT and Nanox Vision compare on the numbers?
MobileODT leads on headcount growth (-18.9% against -26.3%). Nanox Vision leads on our overall score (52/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 27/100), domain rating (55/100 against 45/100), headcount (118 against 9), funding raised ($105M against $13.5M), LinkedIn following (9,547 against 4,662).
What do real users say about MobileODT and Nanox Vision?
MobileODT: 3 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/prnewswire.
Read the full MobileODT review and pricing or the Nanox Vision review and pricing. You can also browse other MobileODT alternatives we track.